Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 PAD&C3D 119 - Commonwealth v. Marker

Commonwealth v. Marker’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1988
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Commonwealth v. Robinson · Commonwealth v. Hess · Hack v. Hack · Commonwealth v. Wilkes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Res gestae statements lack that deliberate quality. Moreover, as respects family harmony, third party evidence of a spouse’s spontaneous excited on-the-spot utterance is not nearly as offensive or disturbing to domestic peace as is confronting the spouse on trial with the other spouse’s direct testimony from the stand which was the original target of the prohibition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.