25 So. 3d 1012 - State Ex Rel. Ab’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 852 So. 2d 450 - State v. Schexnaider · 861 So. 2d 118 - State v. Cisco · Shaffer v. Amada America, Inc. · State, in Interest of Jcg · 838 So. 2d 34 - State v. Griffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With regard to disposition, La. Ch. Code art. 901 provides, in pertinent part: A. In considering dispositional options, the court shall not remove a child from the custody of his parents unless his welfare or the safety and protection of the public cannot, in the opinion of the court, be adequately safeguarded without such removal. B. The court should impose the least restrictive disposition authorized by Articles 897 through 900 of this Title which the court finds is consistent with the circumstances of the case, the needs of the child, and the best interest of society. 17Additionally, this court, in State ex rel. M.N.H., 01-1218, pp. 8-9 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 807 So.2d 1149, 1154-55 , writ denied, 02-1041 (La.5/24/02), 816 So.2d 857 , stated: When an excessive disposition is complained of in a juvenile proceeding, the record must be reviewed to determine whether the juvenile court imposed the least restrictive disposition consistent with the circumstances of the case, the child’s needs, and the best interest of society. State ex. rel. K.H., 98-632 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/16/98) ; 725 So.2d 583 ; State in Interest of T.L., 28,564 (La.App. 2 Cir. 5/8/96); 674 So.2d 1122 . In any review for excessiveness, the appellate court must first ascertain whether the lower tribunal took cognizance of the general guidelines provided for juvenile cases in Louisiana Children’s Code Article 901, and whether the record reflects an adequate factual basis for the commitment imposed. State in Int”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.