Hopper v. KREVINEC’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 586 So. 2d 768 - Delta CMI v. Speck · 861 So. 2d 330 - Raytheon Aerospace Support Serv. v. Miller · 566 So. 2d 1261 - Hardin's Bakeries v. Dependent of Harrell · 192 So. 2d 266 - Kersh v. Greenville Sheet Metal Works · 773 So. 2d 380 - McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Caprice Banks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where medical expert testimony is concerned, the supreme court has held that whenever the expert evidence is conflicting, the [c]ourt will affirm the Commission whether the award is for or against the claimant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Commission serves as the ultimate fact finder in addressing conflicts in medical testimony and opinion[s].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.