Murley v. Wiedamann’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 181 Ohio App. 3d 519 - Knott v. Revolution Software, Inc. · 620 So. 2d 786 - ROYAL OAK LANDING HOME-OWNER'S ASS'N v. Pelletier · 821 So. 2d 350 - Delissio v. Delissio · Taylor v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When interpreting a contract, the court must first examine the plain language of the contract for evidence of the parties' intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.