Laney v. Garmon’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 557 So. 2d 1249 - Bean v. Craig · 406 So. 2d 834 - JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. Campbell · 506 So. 2d 1003 - Ex Parte Harris · Washington Mutual Finance, LLC v. Steele · F.G. v. State Department of Human Resources
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A judgment is generally not final unless all claims, or the rights or liabilities of all parties, have been decided. Ex parte Harris, 506 So.2d 1003, 1004 (Ala.Civ.App.1987). The only exception to this rule of finality is when the trial court directs the entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. E.H. v. K.H. · Austin v. Austin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.