State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · County of Riverside v. McLaughlin · 633 So. 2d 1224 - State v. Neisler · 392 So. 2d 410 - State v. Wallace · State v. Charles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not void a subsequent conviction.... 'Thus, although a suspect who is presently detained may challenge the probable cause for that confinement, a conviction will not be vacated on th[at] ground.’ ” State v. Wallace, 09-1621, p. 4 (La.11/6/09), 25 So.3d 720, 723 (quoting Gerstein, 420 U.S. at 119 , 95 S.Ct. 854 ). .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Persons continued or remaining in custody pursuant to an arrest made without a warrant shall be entitled to a determination of probable cause within forty-eight hours of arrest. The probable cause determination shall be made by a magistrate and shall not be an adversary proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In the absence of a bona fide emergency or other extreme circumstances, all persons arrested without a warrant for whom a probable cause determination is not made within 48 hours must be immediately released from custody on their own recognizance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.