State v. Sumlin’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Negron v. United States · Griffith v. United States · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Ejvidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is not admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show that he acted in conformity therewith. It may, however, be admissible for other purposes, such as proof of motive, op portunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, absence of mistake or accident, provided that upon request by the accused, the h (¡prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial, of the nature of any such evidence it intends to introduce at trial for such purposes, or when it relates to conduct that constitutes an integral part of the act or transaction that is the subject of the present proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.