Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 SW3D 233 - Lam v. State

Lam v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 25th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Rhode Island v. Innis · Almanza v. State · Montgomery v. State · Guzman v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “custodial interrogation” occurs when a person in custody is subjected to direct questioning or its functional equivalent, which occurs when police officers engage in conduct that they know is likely to elicit an incriminating response from the defendant. McCrory v. State, 643 S.W.2d 725, 734 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982). Appellant relies on McCrory , but the record does not show Detective Ormsby's actions to be the functional equivalent of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.