Patton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 216th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Montgomery v. State · King v. State · Green v. State · Zillender v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant argues the admission of the late-noticed recording violates article 37.07, section 3(g), because the article requires notice be provided in the same manner required by rule 404(b), and the plain language of rule 404(b) requires notice be provided”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferrer v. State“there is no bright line as to the number of days or amount of time alone [that] constitutes reasonable notice”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferrer v. State“It has been held that Rule 404(b) does not apply to the penalty or punishment phase of a bifurcated trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.