Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

25 S.W.3d 571

Cantrell v. Dumey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-07-25

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2019

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Kenneth Cantrell (Appellant) d/b/a Cantrell’s Crossroads Real Estate appeals the trial court’s judgment granting summary judgment in favor of Danny and Brenda Dumey (Respondents) in this action for real estate commission.

¶3Appellant raises two points on appeal. First, Appellant claims the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on behalf of Respondents because a valid listing agreement existed. Second, Appellant asserts he did not breach the compromise agreement.

¶4We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

¶5The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/25/sw3d/571 · .json · Public domain