Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 S.W.3d 58 - Brashars v. Commonwealth

Brashars v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Manson v. Brathwaite · California v. Trombetta · Crane v. Kentucky · State v. Kelekolio · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we disagree ... that fundamental fairness cannot be ensured by a trial court's resolution of factual disputes regarding custodial interrogations on the basis of testimony from the persons involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Kentucky Rules of Evidence contain no requirement that ... testimony relating to a declarant’s oral statement must be a verbatim recitation of that statement,” and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.