Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

25 Tex. 305

Nelson v. Bagby

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1860

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1860-10-15

Error from Bosque. The case was tried before Hon. NT. W. Battle, one of the district judges. On the 4th of April, 1865, Thomas Bagby, “ as administrator of Willis H. Hughes,” recovered a judgment in the Superior Court of Eulton county, Georgia, against ¡Nelson for $1,110 25. This record was certified in accordance with the act of Congress of the 26th May, 1790. (Paschal’s Dig., Art. 3709, ¡Note 835; Paschal’s Annot.

Decided 1860-10-15

Roberts, J.

¶1—The petition of plaintiff below commences as follows: “Your petitioner, Thomas Bagby, as the administrator de bonis non of the estate of "Willis H. Hughes, deceased, a resident citizen of the State of Georgia, humbly complaining of Allison Kelson,” &c., and it proceeds to set out, as the cause of action, a judgment recovered in the State of Georgia by Bagby, in that capacity, against Kelson and another. Kelson excepted to the petition, upon the ground that Bagby had no right to bring the suit in that capacity, which exception was overruled, and that is the error complained of.

¶2The words “as administrator,” &c., may he treated as surplusage, being an unnecessary description of the capacity in which he had recovered the judgment in Georgia. It was immaterial by what right he had recovered the judgment there; it stood in force in his name, and, although others may have an equitable interest in it as a right of action, having the legal title, he could sue in Ms own name upon it. (Gayle et al. v. Ennis et al., and authorities cited, 1 Tex., 184; Lipscomb et al. v. Ward et al., 2 Tex., 277; also, Ib., 412; Claiborne v. Yoeman, 15 Tex., 45.)

¶3We are of opinion that the court did not err in sustaining the petition thus excepted to.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

/25/tex/305 · .json · Public domain