Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 U.S. 117 - Williams v. Norris

Williams v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis

25 U.S. 117 · 1827

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984), Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown (1984)

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

90182718301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin Fairfax v. Hunter's · Miller United States v. Nicholls · Inglee v. Coolidge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the judgment [of the lower court] should be correct, although the reasoning, by which the mind of the Judge was conducted to it, should be deemed unsound, that judgment would certainly be affirmed in [this] Court''). 13 The defendants, including the two petitioners, stipulated before the District Court that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Depositions, and exhibits of every description, are papers in the cause, and, in one sense of the word, form a part of the record. In some States they are recorded by direction of law. But, in a jury cause, they constitute no part of the record on which the judgment of an appellate Court is to be exercised, unless made a part of it by bill of exceptions, or in some other manner recognised by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.