Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

25 U.S.C. § 1901

Section 1901 · Congressional findings

This is § 2 of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978

Amended 1 time on record

Applied in 977 court decisions — leading case Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield (1989)

Most recently applied in 347 Or. App. 425 - Dept. of Human Services v. K. C. W. (February 2026)

Cases citing this section usually also cite 25 U.S.C. § 1912 · 25 U.S.C. § 1903 · 25 U.S.C. § 1902

How often courts cite this section

1978198019902000201020202026700cited by95-608enacted · 1978 · 95-608Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfieldleading · 1989 · Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield
citing decisions per year

Court decisions citing this, by year.Markers show enactment and consequential amendments — watch for a citation surge after a change. The dip in the last several years is a data-coverage gap, not a real trend — our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so recent citations are undercounted.

Recognizing the special relationship between the United States and the Indian tribes and their members and the Federal responsibility to Indian people, the Congress finds—

(1) that clause 3, section 8, article I of the United States Constitution provides that “The Congress shall have Power * * * To regulate Commerce * * * with Indian tribes 1” and, through this and other constitutional authority, Congress has plenary power over Indian affairs;

(2) that Congress, through statutes, treaties, and the general course of dealing with Indian tribes, has assumed the responsibility for the protection and preservation of Indian tribes and their resources;

(3) that there is no resource that is more vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children and that the United States has a direct interest, as trustee, in protecting Indian children who are members of or are eligible for membership in an Indian tribe;

(4) that an alarmingly high percentage of Indian families are broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and that an alarmingly high percentage of such children are placed in non-Indian foster and adoptive homes and institutions; and

(5) that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative and judicial bodies, have often failed to recognize the essential tribal relations of Indian people and the cultural and social standards prevailing in Indian communities and families.

Editorial notes U.S. Code · Office of the Law Revision Counsel

Short Title

Section 1 of Pub. L. 95–608 provided: “That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the ‘Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978’.”

/25/usc/1901 · .json · Public domain