Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Utah 2d 328 - State v. Jaramillo

25 Utah 2d 328 - State v. Jaramillo’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably State v. Lafferty (2001), State v. Schreuder (1985)

26 state decisions

14019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. Ewell · State v. Lawrence · 14 Utah 2d 170 - Cobb v. Snow · State v. McIntyre

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Where the defendant has complained of errors that vitiate the prior proceedings and judgment and they are nullified at his request, he cannot then take the inconsistent position that there was a valid proceeding and judgment against him which constitute a former jeopardy.!”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “No elaboration is necessary to make apparent the difficulties that would be encountered in trying to determine and carry out a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, minus 30 months.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The answer to this perplexity is to be found in practical common sense. Both the prison authorities and the Board of Pardons have available to them the total record of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.