State v. George’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to indulge an inference upon an inference that could lead but to conjecture not justifying a conclusion that [possession had been proven] beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of any [other] reasonable hypothesis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman“that the [trial] court itself suggested the matter of reasonable doubt and supplied an hypothesis itself that reasonably is inconsistent with larceny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman“[w]e believe that there are other hypotheses inconsistent with a larceny that could be constructed out of the tenuous facts extant here,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Layman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.