Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 VT 680 - Exparte Langdon

Exparte Langdon’s Empirical Analysis

1853

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
7
states following
February 1973
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1973

12 state decisions

201853186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yates v. Lansing

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But this proceeding, in terms is an adjudication of the relator being guilty of the contempt, and that process issue for his arrest and commitment, or punishment. If the party is out of the jurisdiction, process may be left at his usual abode, or with his solicitor. But here, nothing of the kind is attempted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “But this is a distinct, and independent matter, as much as a new suit, and obviously requires a distinct notice, as much as a new suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.