Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Wash. 2d 664 - Davis v. P. E. Harris & Co.

25 Wash. 2d 664 - Davis v. P. E. Harris & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1953
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Slater v. Mexican National Railroad · Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Wallace · Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Pollard v. Bailey · Tennessee Coal Iron Railroad Company v. Wiley George

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By that statute the right and remedy are so united, and the provision for liability is so coupled with a provision for a special remedy to be administered by a designated tribunal with certain specific powers given, that the remedy must be sought in the designated tribunal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.