25 Wash. App. 327 - State v. Gilcrist’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Patterson v. New York · 91 Wash. 2d 603 - State v. Gilcrist · 89 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. McDonald · 88 Wash. 2d 573 - State v. Mriglot · 15 Wash. App. 892 - State v. Gilcrist
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]nce the status of habitual criminal under [RCW 9.92.090] has attached to a person, successive determinations for the same person are meaningless unless the Governor has pardoned him. This is because the status once determined can be utilized thereafter by the sentencing court, upon receipt of proof of such status, in establishing the appropriate sentence for an habitual criminal convicted of another crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.