Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Wash. App. 377 - State v. Norton

25 Wash. App. 377 - State v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2014

12 state decisions

501980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 85 Wash. 2d 176 - Hartman v. Washington State Game Commission · 91 Wash. 2d 654 - State v. Lawley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In such case, if the party injured appear in the court in which the cause is pending at any time before the final judgment therein, and acknowledge, in writing, that he has received satisfaction for the injury, the court may, in its discretion, on payment of the costs incurred, order all proceedings to be discontinued and the defendant to be discharged. The reasons for making the order must be set forth therein and entered in the minutes. Such order is a bar to another prosecution for the same offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The essence of the compromise of misdemeanors statute is restitution to crime victims and avoidance of prosecution for minor offenders. These functions are consistent with the purposes of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, specifically RCW 13.40.010(2)(g) and (Tí)." (Italics ours.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) By or upon an officer while in the execution of the duties of his office.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.