25 Wash. App. 615 - State v. Thorkelson’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2002
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 47 Ill. 2d 300 - The PEOPLE v. Holiday · People v. Anderson · 89 Wash. 2d 430 - State v. Hilliard · 85 Wash. 2d 207 - State v. Shoemaker · 81 Wash. 2d 205 - State v. Nettles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a photographic identification conducted while a defendant is in custody, although not favored, will be suppressed only if it is so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“absent extenuating circumstances, photographic identification procedures of an in-custody defendant should not be used.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The police were within their rights when they stated they would impound ... [the] house until a search warrant could be secured. Bowing to events about which one may be unhappy does not render a consent involuntary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Punguk v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.