Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Wash. App. 795 - State v. Pella

25 Wash. App. 795 - State v. Pella’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
August 1992
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Haili v. United States · United States v. Metcalf · State v. Howe · 84 Wash. 2d 969 - In Re Carson · 9 Wash. App. 792 - State v. Scherck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “official proceeding” begins, at the earliest, with the filing of a complaint. Both Howe and Pella dealt with the offense of tampering with a witness, however, and neither of the statutes at issue extended the offense to situations involving”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “has reason to believe is about to be called as a witness in any official proceeding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.