Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 25 Wash. App. 933 - State v. Russell

25 Wash. App. 933 - State v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2018

23 state decisions

901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ker v. State of California · 84 Wash. 2d 256 - State v. Carothers · 36 Wash. 2d 367 - State v. Goebel · 73 Wash. 2d 533 - State v. Dana · State v. Wroth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “negative in nature and conveys no affirmative information,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “While a principal may not be subject to the penalty enhancement provisions where he is unarmed and without knowledge that his accomplice is armed, this does not mean that the provision is inapplicable to the armed accomplice.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “communicate with a deliberating jury only with all counsel ... present.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.