The Barge 123’s Empirical Analysis
250 F. 476 · 1917
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1920
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on The Oregon · The Charles Hubbard · The Juniata
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Weather conditions were something the Llahberis was bound to notice and to take proper precautions against. The possibility that, if the wind should increase, she might drag a single anchor was evident. * * * When the gale came on, everything suggested the necessity of keeping a sharp lookout against dragging; yet her anchor watch entirely failed to observe that the steamer was doing so until too late for her to avoid fouling the barge. If they had noticed the danger in time, ánd had dropped the second anchor, the accident would have been prevented. Their negligence stands unexplained and unexcused. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. The Newa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.