Shaffer v. Howard’s Empirical Analysis
250 F. 873 · 1918
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1936
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Cannon v. United States · Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. · Knowlton v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is argued that the provisions which deny to nonresidents the exemptions which are allowed to residents * * violate section 2 of article 4 of the federal Constitution, which provides that ‘the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states.’ * * * We regard it as a question involved in considerable doubt, and one not necessary to be passed upon now.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Each and every person in this State, shall be hable to. an annual tax upon the entire net income of such person arising or accruing from all sources during the preceding calendar year, and a like tax shall be levied, assessed, collected and paid annually upon the entire net income from all property owned, and of everv business, trade or profession carried on in this State by persons residing elsewhere.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shaffer v. Carter“essentially a tax upon his property and. business within the State, to which the property and business of citizens and residents of the State are not subjected,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shaffer v. Carter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.