Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

250 F.2d 283

Docket No. 12006.

Willmore Knight v. Joseph D. Bibb, Director, Etc.

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1957-12-20

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States ex rel. Atterbury v. Ragen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Philip J. Finnegan · Decided 1957-12-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1970

5 federal appellate ·

40195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Willmore Knight, pro. per.

Latham Castle, Atty. Gen., William C. Wines, Theodore G. Maheras, Asst. Attys. Gen., of counsel, for appellees.

Before FINNEGAN, SCHNACKENBERG and HASTINGS, Circuit Judges.

FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge.

¶1

We think dismissal of plaintiff's complaint for damages under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 et seq., was legally sound and correct. We have found no error affecting substantial rights. Knight's allegations of his beatings and maltreatment of the plaintiff by the Warden and other officers at the Illinois State Penitentiary, where he is now an inmate, bring this case under our opinion reported as United States ex rel. Atterbury v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 953, and the cases there collected.

¶2

The judgment appealed is affirmed.

¶3

Affirmed.

/250/f2d/283 · .json · Public domain