Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 F.2d 690 - Rippy v. Borders

Rippy v. Borders’s Empirical Analysis

250 F.2d 690 · 1957

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
July 1975
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently July 1975 · most notably United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education (1966), United States v. Jefferson County Board of Education (1967)

49 federal appellate · 1 district ·

390195719601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Brown v. Board of Education · School Board of the City of Charlottesville v. Allen · Borders v. Rippy · Avery v. Wichita Falls Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It must be remembered that the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States in Brown v. Board of Education, 1954, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 and 1955, 349 U.S. 294 , 75 S.Ct. 753 , 99 L.Ed. 1083 , do not compel the mixing of the different races in the public schools. No general reshuffling of the pupils in any school system has been commanded. The order of that Court is simply that no child shall be denied admission to a school on the basis of race or color. * * * Consequently, compliance with that ruling may well not necessitate such extensive changes in the school system as some anticipate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the performance of that duty, the district court must exercise its own judgment and discretion in accordance with the applicable principles of law set forth in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, supra.” (Emphasis by the Court.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.