Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 F.2d 897 - Jackson v. United States

Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

250 F.2d 897 · 1958

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
9
states following
January 1993
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently January 1993 · most notably United States v. Freeman (1966), Cephus v. United States (1963)

52 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

30019581960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287

Relies on Lutwak v. United States · Funk v. United States · Miles v. United States · Griffin v. United States · Olender v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Motion Before Submission to Jury. Motions for directed verdict are abolished and motions for judgment of acquittal shall be used in their place. The court on motion of a defendant or of its own motion shall order the entry of judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment or information after the evidence on either side is closed if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense or offenses. If a defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence offered by the government is not granted, the defendant may offer evidence without having reserved the right. “(b) Reservation of Decision on Motion. If a motion for judgment of acquittal is made at the close of all the evidence, the court may reserve decision on the motion, submit the case to the jury and decide the motion either before the jury returns a verdict or after it returns a verdict of guilty or is discharged without having returned a verdict.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Silence in the absence of a duty to speak, is not an admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.