Ester v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis
250 F.3d 1068 · 2001
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Nurriddin v. Bolden (2009), Horton v. Potter (2004)
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Harris v. Reed · McKart v. United States · Brown v. General Services Administration · United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the well-settled rule that agencies do not waive a timeliness defense merely by accepting and investigating a discrimination complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.