Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 F.3d 1354 - United States v. McDowell

United States v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis

250 F.3d 1354 · 2001

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Brown (2006), United States v. Miles (2002)

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

660200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Minnesota v. Murphy · United States v. Calderon · In re Reidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not necessary that the evidence exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be wholly inconsistent with every conclusion except that of guilt, provided that a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. A jury is free to choose among the constructions of the evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To sustain a conviction for attempted possession with intent to distribute cocaine, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant!] (1) acted with the kind of culpability required to possess cocaine knowingly and wilfully and with the intent to distribute it; and (2) engaged in conduct which constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of the crime under circumstances strongly corroborative of their criminal intent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. (quotation marks omitted). 2 . See United States v. Mejia, 97 F.3d 1391, 1392 (11th Cir.1996) (stating that the elements of cocaine conspiracy include:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.