Suez Equity Investors Lp and Sei Associates v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank’s Empirical Analysis
250 F.3d 87 · 2001
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 302 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co. (2005), Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase Bank (2004)
33 federal appellate · 24 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Singleton v. Wulff · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 302 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any private action arising under this chapter, the plaintiff shall have the burden of proving that the act or omission of the defendant alleged to violate this chapter caused the loss for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages.”
16 later decisions quote this exact passage“[1] whether the person making the representation held or appeared to hold unique or special expertise; [2] whether a special relationship of trust or confidence existed between the parties; and [3] whether the speaker was aware of the use to which the information would be put and supplied it for that purpose.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[P]laintiffs may allege ... loss causation by averring ... that the defendants' misrepresentations induced a disparity between the transaction price and the true `investment quality' of the securities at the time of the transaction.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.