Muro v. Target Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
3 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1602 (§ 103 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1637 (§ 127 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (§ 130 of the Truth in Lending Act)
Relies on Upjohn Company v. United States · Anderson Bros. Ford v. Valencia · Bell v. Eastman Kodak Co. · Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. · Abdullahi ex rel. Estate of Mohamed v. City of Madison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In any event, blanket waiver is not a favored remedy for technical inadequacies in a privilege log.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.