Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Ga. 206 - Davis v. Davis

Davis v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2014

15 state decisions

1001982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kaufmann v. Kaufmann · Gallit v. Buckley · Roberts v. Roberts · Ward v. Ward · Reid v. McRae

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the clarification is reasonable or whether it is so contrary to the apparent intention of the original order as to amount to a modification.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court in a contempt case has wide discretion to determine whether [its] orders have been violated. [Its] determination will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of an abuse of discretion. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.