250 Ga. App. 494 - Page v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 224 Ga. App. 656 - Brewer v. State · Rucker v. State · 201 Ga. App. 421 - Shropshire v. State · 224 Ga. App. 608 - Anderson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]fter being sentenced, Page informed the trial court that he felt his case was “tainted” because “one of the jurors in the back may have seen me come from the back[, where the holding cell was located,] with my attorney.” The trial court pointed out that the person had been a prospective juror and that Page had not been in “jail clothes” or in handcuffs. The court noted for the record that while Page may have been seen coming from the holding area, “it’s a wooden, brown door and there’s nothing about it that identifies it as a holding area.” Page admitted that neither he nor his lawyer had requested that anyone be questioned about the issue prior to the conclusion of voir dire. Page cannot now complain about what he failed to timely raise to the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Patterson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.