250 Ga. App. 617 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 113 Ga. App. 328 - Hoard v. Wiley · 121 Ga. App. 560 - Sisk v. Carney · 194 Ga. App. 724 - Lawrenz v. State · 189 Ga. App. 311 - Lovell v. State · 225 Ga. App. 337 - Cardwell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Opinion evidence as to the value of an item, in order to have probative value, must be based upon a foundation that the witness has some knowledge, experience or familiarity with the value of the property or similar property and he must give reasons for the value assessed and also must have had an opportunity for forming a correct opinion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the fair market value of these items, the condition of the items, or an appropriate method of discounting the items from their replacement value to their fair market value. Without any such evidence on the record, we cannot say that the State has shouldered its burden of proving the fair market value of the [affected] items upon which an order of restitution may be based.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.