Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Ill. App. 3d 997 - Naylor v. Kindred

250 Ill. App. 3d 997 - Naylor v. Kindred’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently March 2014

22 state decisions

160199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 77 Ill. 2d 414 - In Re Custody of Harne · 112 Ill. 2d 48 - In Re Custody of Peterson · 55 Ill. App. 3d 545 - Ranquist v. Stackler · 93 Ill. App. 3d 204 - Milenkovic v. Milenkovic · 192 Ill. App. 3d 501 - In Re Marriage of Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[A]n incarcerated parent, much like a deceased parent, is no longer able to care for, supervise, provide a home, prepare food, obtain medical treatment, or be involved in the daily life of the child. In short, an incarcerated parent cannot fulfill the role of a physical custodian of the child. Although incarceration may not absolutely prevent a parent from fulfilling the role of the child's legal custodian, it does impair this ability. The parent is not readily available to give advice or console the child, or to be an example. Further, the incarcerated parent is not readily available to consent to medical treatment and decide other issues generally reserved to legal custodians." Naylor, 250 Ill.App.3d at 1009 , 189 Ill.Dec. 552 , 620 N.E.2d 520 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"[w]hen a parent to whom custody was originally awarded is incapable, due to his or her incarceration, of continuing physical custody of the child, and the child is being cared for by a third party, that is a significant change in circumstances and custody may be modified *** if such modification is in the best interests of the child.” (Emphasis in original.) (Naylor, 250 Ill. App. 3d at 1015-16 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.