Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Iowa 314 - Schmidt v. Claus

Schmidt v. Claus’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1986
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1986

9 state decisions

701958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCulloch's Estate v. Conrad · Moore v. McKinley · In Re Miller's Estate. · In Re Estate of Lewis · Tague v. Tague

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, it seems proper to comment that the rule against repugnancy which we have adopted, and have applied here, is highly technical and generally has the effect, as in the instant case, of reaching a result which the testator did not intend and which is contrary to the express intent of the will if it is construed in accordance with its plain language.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.