Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Ky. 640 - Johnson v. Caddell

Johnson v. Caddell’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 1946
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Origet v. United States · Smith v. . Geiger · Fairbanks v. Beard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are thus led to conclude, out of a full regard for the worthy purpose here aimed at by the statute, in requiring the writing of his name [rather than only his .initials] by a judge of the election on the ballot, with the intent to safeguard its identity and sure authentication, is best realized and effectuated through holding that the required signing of the judge’s name upon the ballot should mean, and does here mean, the Writing by him of his full name, or at least of his initials and surname, therein. This construction of the statutory provision, we conceive, is best calculated to secure and safeguard the integrity of the ballot contemplated in its-enactment. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.