Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Md. 541 - McCally v. McCally

McCally v. McCally’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2008 · most notably Bledsoe v. Bledsoe (1982), Attorney Grievance Commission v. Harris (2008)

5 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

23019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brison v. Brison · Oxley v. Oxley · Reed v. Reed · Brell v. Brell · Columbian Carbon Co. v. Kight

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The lower court relied on Gunter v. Gunter, supra, as clearly establishing that in the absence of fraud or undue influence, the courts of Maryland will not inquire into the contribution by parties to a tenancy by the entireties prior to the joint acquisition. When we couple the decision of Gunter, with the language of Anderson, v. Anderson, supra, whereby an absolute gift is presumed when the non-contributing spouse is given an equal interest in the property as one of the tenants by the entireties, we conclude that the lower court in rejecting the doctrine of Moore [v. Moore, 51 App. D.C. 304 , 278 F. 1017 (1922)], correctly interpreted the law of this State.” Id. at 548.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.