Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2002
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fisher v. State · Smith v. State · Martin v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. · Parker v. State · Morris v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No further objection was made on behalf of the defense attorney; no request was made to exclude the answer and request the jury not to consider it; no request was made for the court to enter a mistrial; in other words, there was nothing else said on this subject. We do not believe this is reversible error. Mills v. State, 231 Miss. 687 , 97 So.2d 517 [ 93 So.2d 821 ] (1957); Smith v. State, 217 Miss. 123 , 63 So.2d 557 (1953); Fisher v. State, 150 Miss. 206 , 116 So. 746 (1928); Morris v. State, 148 Miss. 680 , 114 So. 750 (1927). ( 250 Miss. at 790 , 168 So.2d at 634 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.