Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 N.C. App. 254 - State v. Ward

250 N.C. App. 254 - State v. Ward’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pennington · State v. Ali · State v. Anthony · State v. Whitaker · State v. Bunch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]actical decisions, such as which witnesses to call, 'whether and how to conduct cross-examinations, what jurors to accept or strike, and what trial motions to make are ultimately the province of the lawyer. ....'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “However, when counsel and a fully informed criminal defendant ... reach an absolute impasse as to such tactical decisions [during trial], the client's wishes must control....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “this Court has held that despite a conflict, trial counsel is not compelled to pursue strategy or tactical decisions based on frivolous or unsupported claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.