Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 Or. 295 - Huffstutter v. Lind

Huffstutter v. Lind’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2022

2 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

401968197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Nevertheless, attorney fees are generally allowable as damages in an action against a defendant where the defendant's tortious or wrongful conduct involved the plaintiff in prior litigation with a third party. But the mere filing of a declaration of interest in real property, which declaration is later found to be invalid, does not, in the absence of bad faith, constitute such tortious or wrongful conduct. There is no allegation or proof of bad faith in the instant case. Nor is there any statute authorizing an award of attorney fees herein. Therefore, the allowance by the trial court was erroneous." 250 Or. at 301 , 442 P.2d 227 . (Emphasis supplied; citations omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In the absence of contract, attorneys fees are allowable only where there is statutory authority. Draper v. Mullennex, 225 Or. 267, 271, 357 P.2d 519 (1960).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.