Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 ORAPP 316 - State v. Witherspoon

State v. Witherspoon’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[D]efendant may have acquired the additional objective in [their child's] bedroom *** to stop [the victim] from taking [their child] with her as she tried to flee from defendant, [but] defendant's earlier and ongoing criminal objective to harass and abuse [the victim] continued throughout the episode.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “does not detract from the focus on the overarching criminal objective that is required under a proper application of the standard that the legislature established in ORS 131.505(4)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]o accept that defendant's criminal objective changed over the course of the [domestic] abuse would improperly parse defendant's criminal objective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.