Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 250 SO3D 817 - Armas v. State

Armas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 577 So. 2d 939 - State v. McCloud · 3 So. 3d 1067 - Valdes v. State · 934 So. 2d 1167 - State v. Paul · 894 So. 2d 941 - State v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is no constitutional prohibition against multiple punishments for different offenses arising out of the same criminal transaction as long as the Legislature intends to authorize separate punishments.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.