Kintopp v. Pieper’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1959
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. Cheshire · Sweda v. State · Birdsall v. Fraenzel · Belt Line Realty Co v. Dick · Graham v. Zellers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the relative credibility and weight of the testimony of the witnesses, and the corroborative values of the circumstantial evidence, were primarily for the consideration of the trial court; and its findings are not to be disturbed on an appeal, if there is sufficient credible evidence to sustain them, and no error prejudicial to appellant occurred in ruling on the admission of evidence.” Graham v. Zellers, 205 Wis. 542, 544 , 238 N. W. 385; Will of Kintopp, 250 Wis. 381 , 27 N. W. (2d) 481 (decided May 13, 1947).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bajerle v. Banna
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.