Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 BR 705 - In Re Lucio

In Re Lucio’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 343 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334

Relies on Peterson Armstrong v. E Peterson · In Re Tikijian · In Re Combs · In Re Gridley · Hawkins v. Eads (In Re Eads)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The personal representative in Texas does not acquire the authority to speak on behalf of the decedent’s estate however until the Probate Court issues letters testamentary or letters of administration. See Tex.Prob.Code §§ 178, 183. Thus, there can be no appearance at the first meeting by “the debtor” in circumstances such as those sub judice until such letters have been issued. It may well be necessary to continue the first meeting to afford the personal representative a fair opportunity to obtain such letters from the state probate court, and that is what needs to be done in this particular case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.