In Re Euler’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1302 · 11 U.S.C. § 1308 (§ 716 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1321 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1327 · 11 U.S.C. § 1329
Relies on Delaware v. New York · Sanders Confectionery Products Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc. · Nos. 90-2039, 90-2040 · Davis v. Runyon · In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is silent as to whether the court should impose any conditions on a modification ... other than those provided by § 1329(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Marcelino Barbosa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.