Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 CALAPP2D 732 - Long v. Long

Long v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Rusell S. (1990), 22 Cal. 4th 1227 - In Re Lucero L. (2000)

38 state decisions

120196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fewel v. Fewel · 225 Cal. App. 2d 476 - Forslund v. Forslund · 101 Cal. App. 2d 831 - Exley v. Exley · 175 Cal. App. 2d 850 - Caesar's Restaurant v. Industrial Accident Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Due process of law requires that each party (a) receive a copy of the report, (b) be given an opportunity to cross-examine the investigative officer and to subpoena and examine persons whose hearsay statements are contained in the report, and (c) be permitted to introduce evidence by way of rebuttal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.