Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 F.1d 47 - Drabant v. Cure

Drabant v. Cure’s Empirical Analysis

251 F. 47 · 1918

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 1926
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Barlow v. Fox · McKibbin v. Martin · McClure v. Forney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Undoubtedly the Pennsylvania decisions, from Clow v. Wood, 5 Serg. & R. 275 , 9 Am. Dec. 348 , with the intervening cases, to Barlow v. Fox, 203 Pa. St. 114 , 52 Atl. 57 , hold that retention of possession when actual delivery is practical is a fraud in law, and will not avail against creditors.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.