Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 251 F.2d 311 - Baumgardner v. Commissioner

Baumgardner v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
July 2015
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently July 2015 · most notably Stone v. Commissioner (1971), Otsuki v. Commissioner (1969)

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2901957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Holland v. United States · Spies v. United States · Cohan v. Commissioner · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[c]onsistent, substantial understatements of income for several years.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * It is no more than proof of income by circumstantial or indirect evidence. If a taxpayer’s net worth has increased over a period of time and the increase is not due to nontaxable receipts or nontaxable appreciation of assets, the conclusion is inescapable that taxable income has been received. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “necessary in every case. On the contrary, should all possible sources of nontaxable income be negatived, there would be no necessity for proof of a likely source.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.